education and technology
Each classroom was a bit different depending on the grade and teacher. The school was physically designed like a pentagon. In the middle was the library and off the back end was the gym and lunch room. The other hallways entered into a round hang out area and open classrooms with small pods that had different projects. Each pod had about 4 chairs so you could do your project independently or with a friend. The teachers monitored your work with the hope that you would complete the options available for learning every four weeks. That is basically what I remember. For me, those two years were a complete wasteland.
I was the supreme tether-ball and spit (the card game) champion. I also got into gymnastics and enjoyed doing cartwheels. On occasion, a project grabbed my interest and I actually do recall doing a research project on cancer. The teachers were probably surprised that I could put a sentence together. When my mother went in for the parent/teacher conference, she was a bit concerned as the teacher spent more time discussing her than me. Many of the teachers were a bunch of stoners from the 60's and were into this new educational concept.
Fast forward, I get to seventh grade in an old fashioned structured school where you move from class to class every 50 minutes and culture shock sets in. My parents weren't exactly paying attention to my education because when I didn't know what a verb, noun, adverb, adjective or proper sentence was. My math skills weren't exactly riveting either and Science was a blur. They sent me to the dumbest class of the grade for English. It took me about 3 months of ramping up before they sent me up to the classroom with the smarties but those basic English principles still haunt me today. What would have happened if I actually had a decent education in 5 and 6th grade? In reality I learned absolutely nothing those two years except social skills and of course card playing skills. I obviously ended up fine but learning is a life long gift and the system basically took two precious years away from me.
Today there is an article in the NYTimes about a district in Atlanta that has taken a high-tech gamble by filling the classrooms with technology. The students each learn at their own pace by embracing the minds of the youth and how they think these days using facebook, blogging, hip-hop and more. As I read between the lines, what I see is Lake Normandy Elementary School on technology. Digital devices might let kids learn at their own pace and that might be a good thing if the system is seriously managed.
I am a big believer in progressive education. Learn how to break something down and put it back together stays with you forever whereas rote memorization can fly out the window the next day. I love that there are a variety of disruptive educational start-ups happening in the world from online learning to group classrooms with students all over the world. Yet, when it comes to grades K-10th grade (I do believe that 11 and 12th grade can be looked at differently) there needs to be serious monitoring to insure that each of these kids are learning basic fundamentals be it reading certain books, knowing their math tables, understanding the basics of the English language, how to write and research a paper. We can't just let kids educate themselves as they see fit within a classroom. At the college level, the new generation of teachers should be learning how to incorporate technology into the classroom to get great results instead of sticking them in a random district where they are set up to fail because the curriculum they are creating around technology is a learning curve for them too.
Lake Normandy was a learning curve and although the teachers probably walked away with an interesting experience, kids like me walked away as the losers. If we are going to use technology which I am all for, lets make sure the people teaching it are taught how to use it before they walk in as the leaders of a classroom.