Trump’s War on Women
Some readers in Santa Cruz of this blog put together a timeline of Trump’s War on Women. It is worth clicking through!
© Gotham Gal 2024
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Comments (Archived):
.Allow me to take one example which is trumpeted as having an impact on women. This stands for the accuracy and reasonableness of the balance of the presentation.The presentation highlights Pres Trump’s nomination (and subsequent confirmation by the Senate) of Justice Neil Gorsuch to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the SCOTUS as a incremental step threatening the sanctity of Roe v Wade.In fact, this is a replacement of a conservative Justice with another conservative Justice. There is NO change in the likely voting pattern of the SCOTUS. None whatsoever.This is indicative of the intellectual basis for the rest of the presentation. It is sad this so poorly done.JLMwww.themusingsofthebigredca…
Except that nomination should have been Garland. Also fact.
You do realize that the husband of your preferred candidate stuck a cigar into an intern’s snatch while he was President, correct? Was this helpful to women b/c the offender was a Democrat?
Was it helpful to women when the husband of your preferred candidate’s closest confidant sent dick picks to underaged girls? He was a Democrat and a well-named one at that: Weiner!